The foundation of the allopathic cancer industry and modern medicine as we know it was built on GREED, CORRUPTION, AND LIES. Focusing solely on patenting drugs and surgery to accumulate profits over the well-being of the patient, the conventional mafia then did whatever they could to eliminate natural medicine to push their agenda. “By 1925 10,000 herbalists were completely out of business. By 1940 over 1500 chiropractors would be ousted and discredited for practicing “quackery”. The 22 homeopathic medical schools that existed and thrived in the 1900’s were reduced to 2 by 1923. By 1950, all the schools teaching homeopathy were closed. Meanwhile, the real quacks are the medical doctors pushing the synthetic drugs!
Rockefeller put so much money into the universities and filled up the board of directors in these schools with people who were on the payroll of the donors. The curriculum swung in the direction of pharmaceutical drugs and has remained that way ever since. In return for the donated money schools were required to teach course material that was exclusively drug oriented with NO emphasis on natural medicine. (-The Truth About Cancer series)
Cancer is a 200 billion-dollar industry, with almost 50% of people being diagnosed with cancer in their lifetime. The average cancer treatment costs between $300,000 – $1,000,000. Do you really think that they want a cure? The cancer industry/big pharma makes money when you treat cancer with chemo and radiation, NOT when you prevent it or cure it by natural means. Most people make the grave mistake of putting complete trust in hospitals and doctors of conventional medicine when they do not even understand the etiology and pathology of disease. They do not know that the organ systems work in synergy, they have little to no knowledge in nutrition, nor do they understand how disease works in the body. They are taught to address the symptoms of the disease with toxic drugs ONLY, never getting to the root cause of the condition!
So how can you trust medical professionals to help you prevent or cure diseases like cancer? What you need to understand is that most doctors are just PUPPETS for the pharmaceutical industry. This ruthless, soulless industry uses doctors and greedy uneducated representatives to push their agenda! When people die using the “standard of care” with toxic drugs its ok, right? But when non-toxic natural interventions are used, and the patient lives, it’s not politically correct, because the standard of care was not utilized!? This indoctrinated narrow-minded thinking is downright harmful. The conventional medical industry works extremely hard to prevent holistic practitioners from saving people’s lives through natural, non-toxic therapies, which is no different than manslaughter or murder!
CAVEMAN CONVENTIONAL CANCER TREATMENT …
Chemotherapy originated from mustard gas! Yes, the SAME mustard gas that was used in WW1. Mustard gas, just like other chemotherapy agents, is designed to kill the fastest growing cells. Cancer cells are fast growing, but so are hair follicles and bone marrow, stomach, and intestinal cells (where the majority of the immune system resides). This explains WHY chemo patients lose their hair and experience nausea, vomiting, blood disorders, nerve damage, chronic fatigue, immune insufficiencies, increased risk of infection, problems hearing, seeing, and walking, and accelerated aging of the body. Not to mention the increased risk for additional cancers developing from this carcinogenic toxic treatment, which in turn pummels the immune system, damages DNA, and weakens overall metabolic function. Just like in war, this type of poison is designed to cause illness and death!
A weakened immune system and a body overwhelmed with acidic fluids, tissues, and inflammation is the reason why cancer developed in the first place. So why in God’s name would you INFLICT a patient with a highly acidic cancer-causing poisonous treatment that severely damages an already damaged immune system?! Although conventional treatments may kill cancer cells and reduce tumor size, the collateral damage to the patient’s vital organ systems (like the liver and kidneys), along with the physiological pain, psycho-traumatic stress and anxiety associated with these merciless treatments is unavoidable.
The body is NEVER deficient in chemo drugs, only in nutrition, oxygen, movement, and healthy, positive, healing thoughts. Don’t fall for oncologists’ scare tactics. Oncologists get kickbacks for their treatments and have no knowledge in treating cancer beyond the barbaric cut, burn, poison method (aside from synthetic immunotherapies, which come with many negative side effects like all drugs). The ones who do survive this treatment often have serious damage to the rest of their body systems, and since the cancer stem cells can remain alive, the cancer can come back years down the road even more aggressive than the original cancer. Conventional cancer treatments are a totally AVOIDABLE nightmare when you can open your mind to the deception!
Even more disturbing is the fact that most oncologists will tell their patients to avoid any type of natural supplementation, saying they can interfere with the toxic chemical therapies that they are using, which is completely IRRATIONAL advice. They also place little to no focus on diet, which is disgraceful. Anyone with common sense or knowledge outside of an indoctrinated narrow- minded belief system knows that by supporting the body with alkalinizing agents, and/or powerful antioxidant rich foods and supplements you can at least somewhat protect the body’s immune and other organ systems from being mutilated by the poisonous effects of chemo drugs and radiation. This goes to show how BRAINWASHED these doctors are by the pharmaceutical industry!
As for the oncologists’ famous words “I think we got it all!?” I think NOT…Stem cells survive the chemo (chemo only kills the daughter cells). Cytokine immune cells are produced in mass amounts surrounding the stem cell, creating an excessive acid/inflammatory effect, increasing the damage to the DNA so the cancer that comes back is even more malignant than the original cancer (and far more likely to metastasize). It is probable that the patient will become resistant to other conventional treatments as well.
Even with insulin potentiated chemotherapy, a target-specific treatment that can kill up to 70% of the cancer cells, it does NOT kill the cancer stem cells which can make up 3% of the tumor mass. In an interview with Ty Bollinger from The Truth about Cancer, Dr. Bradford Weeks explained why killing the tumor does not eliminate the cancer. Here is what he said:
The real target is to stop cancer stem cells for three reasons – only they metastasize. Tumor cells don’t metastasize. The cancer stem cell metastasizes. The cancer stem cells are resistant to chemo and radiation. So, you can do what you want with chemo and radiation. You are not targeting the real villain, the real culprit. The third thing is that if you don’t address the cancer stem cells your cancer is coming back because those are the ones that can recreate a cancer. But nobody is targeting them. So, I say to my clients if you are going to see your oncologist ask him or her, “What are you going to do to help me be healthy while you kill my tumor?” Because that is all they can do. Current oncologists are only killing tumors and patients, but they are NOT killing cancer stem cells.
The chances of developing secondary cancers or dying from complications from the treatment is FAR greater than dying from the cancer itself!
Chemotherapy causes much more harm than good in most cases – both short term and long term. It damages healthy cells, which then secrete a hormone that accelerates the growth of the tumor, making it seem resistant to the chemo. Even if the patient survives after 5 years of treatment, most often their lives are never the same and the cancer just resurfaces because they never addressed the root cause (the toxic, acidic, nutrient deficient, inflammatory low energy environment). An acidic, inflamed environment elevates the risk that cancer symptoms will materialize somewhere else in the body exponentially, despite the fact that the initial tumor was eliminated. If you don’t change the environment in the body that stimulated the cancer in the first place, how can you prevent it from reestablishing itself? Natural medicine, on the other hand, works to heal the whole patient, not attack the disease haphazardly with deadly chemicals!
Scientists at New York’s Albert Einstein College of Medicine have found that, while shrinking the tumors, chemotherapy opens a gateway for cancer cells to spread into the blood and then to other parts of the body.
According to Ralph Moss, in his book The Cancer Industry:
There is an increased incidence of second, apparently unrelated malignancies in patients who have been “cured” by means of anticancer drugs. This is probably because the drugs themselves are carcinogenic. When radiation and chemotherapy were given together, the incidence of these second tumors was approximately twenty-five times the expected rate. Since both radiation and chemotherapy suppress the immune system, it is possible that new tumors are allowed to grow because the patient has been rendered unable to resist them. In either case, a person who is cured of cancer by these drastic means may find herself struggling with a new, drug-induced tumor a few years later.(Ralph Moss, The Cancer Industry – New Updated Edition – Page 78)
Burton Goldberg, known as the “Voice of Alternative Medicine” proclaims:
We must provide cancer patients with comprehensive integrative care that addresses, to the greatest extent possible, all potential causes of this complex disease. Right now, the focus of mainstream cancer care is to treat the disease, not the person. By contrast, my colleagues and other integrative cancer doctors do the opposite. They treat the person, NOT the disease!
This shift in treatment strategies makes a world of difference for the treatment of all chronic, degenerative disease, but most especially cancer. Currently, conventional oncologists still continue to rely on treatment protocols based on statistical outcomes. At best, these outcomes may show a 30% overall success rate. That’s all well and good for the patients who fall into that 30% group. But what about the 70% who don’t? The answer is that for this larger group, the treatment protocol will fail. Such a statistical-driven, symptom-based treatment protocol for cancer patients is “cookie cutter medicine” at its worst, and many of these “one size fits all” protocols work for far less than 30% of cases! This is another reason why the war on cancer continues to be a failure. And failure is the only word to describe it. For instance, are you aware that research has documented that when chemotherapy alone is used to treat stage-4 cancer patients, the five-year survival rate for such patients is a mere 2.5%? This is both a fact and a travesty. We MUST do better, and we can!”
To manipulate the statistics, they claim that any patient who does not die within 5 years is reported to have had a successful treatment. If a patient goes into remission, then they relapse in 5-10 years and die when the cancer comes back chemo resistant, how can they claim success? Doing nothing can be a more effective treatment for some cancers than standard therapies!
Few people die of cancer, most die of the conventional cancer treatment and complications. “It is well documented that tumors can be encapsulated for an individual’s entire life, never becoming active.” Many cancers aren’t even found until autopsy, because they didn’t produce enough symptoms. It has been shown that you live LONGER if you refused the conventional treatment altogether.
“My studies have proved conclusively that untreated cancer victims live up to FOUR times longer than treated individuals. If one has cancer and opts to do nothing at all, he will live longer and feel better than if he undergoes radiation, chemotherapy or surgery, other than when used in immediate life-threatening situations,” reported Hardin Jones of National Cancer Institute of Bethesda, Maryland, on his survey of global cancer of all types. He compared the untreated and the treated, to conclude that the untreated outlives the treated, both in terms of quality and in terms of quantity. (5)
Statistically 42-46% of cancer patients will die of cachexia (wasting away) and the rest of them die from chemo and radiation treatment damage (liver failure, kidney failure, sepsis, etc.) -The Truth about Cancer 2014 ‘Quest for the Cures’.
No matter what the statistics are (and they are extremely poor), what could justify the pain and torment associated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy?! The ONLY way to justify using chemotherapy and radiation is if alternative treatments failed, and then conventional therapies appreciably prolonged the life of the patient in comparison to no treatment at all.
Conventional cancer screenings can cause more harm than good!
In a 2011 study published in the British Medical Journal researchers concluded that “the introduction of breast cancer screening might have caused net harm for up to 10 years after the start of screening.” (6)
One mammogram screening can generate as much radiation as 1,000 chest X-rays! Dr. Samuel Epstein, one of the world’s top cancer experts made this statement, “The premenopausal breast is highly sensitive to radiation, each 1 rad exposure increasing breast cancer risk by about 1 percent, with a cumulative 10 percent increased risk for each breast over a decade’s screening.” Additionally, if you were to have cancer, mammograms squeeze the breasts so tightly it could cause the cancer to spread!
In a 2009 Cochrane Database Systematic Review of breast cancer screening and mammographs, researchers found that, “Screening led to 30 percent over-diagnosis and overtreatment, or an absolute risk increase of 0.5 percent. This means that for every 2000 women screened for 10 years, one will have her life prolonged, and 10 healthy women who would not have been diagnosed if they had not been screened, will be treated unnecessarily!” (7)
Experts authorized by a National Cancer Institute found that “early stage cancers” are not cancer, they are benign or indolent growths. This translates to millions of women being WRONGLY diagnosed with breast cancer over the years! Many of these women were subjected to toxic dangerous treatments, when they weren’t even necessary!
What’s a safer alternative to mammography??
Thermography creates images that pick-up heat and inflammation and has been shown to detect signs of breast disease up to 10 years before a mammogram! Thermography is non-invasive alternative breast cancer test, and it is highly recommended. If this test picks something up, then you may want to get a mammography in addition, but annual screening with this highly radioactive testing procedure (mammography) is too dangerous.
A 2008 study published in the American Journal of Surgery found that thermography has a 97% “sensitivity rating” for identifying malignancies before a visible tumor has even been formed. (8)
HERE ARE SOME QUOTES FROM VARIOUS DOCTORS AND PRACTITIONERS REGARDING THE SEVERE DANGERS AND INEFFECTIVENESS OF CONVENTIONAL CANCER TREATMENTS
Dr. Ulrich Abel, a German epidemiologist from the Heidelberg/Mannheim Tumor Clinic, conducted a comprehensive review and analysis of every major study and clinical trial of chemotherapy ever done. The analysis took him many years to complete but what he discovered was despicable.
Abel found that the overall worldwide success rate of chemotherapy was ‘appalling’ because there was simply NO scientific evidence available anywhere that chemotherapy can ‘extend in any appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the most common organic cancers’. Abel emphasizes that chemotherapy rarely can improve the quality of life. He describes chemotherapy as ‘a scientific wasteland’ and states that at least 80 percent of chemotherapy administered throughout the world is worthless and is akin to the ’emperor’s new clothes’– neither doctor nor patient is willing to give up on chemotherapy, even though there is no scientific evidence that it works! Of course, no mainstream media even mentioned this comprehensive study: it was totally buried. (Lancet, 10 August 1991)
Dr. Otto Warburg, Medical Nobel Prize winner:
But nobody today can say that one does not know what cancer and its prime cause be. On the contrary, there is no disease whose prime cause is better known, so that today ignorance is no longer an excuse that one cannot do more about prevention. That prevention of cancer will come there is no doubt, for man wishes to survive. But how long prevention will be avoided depends on how long the prophets of agnosticism will succeed in inhibiting the application of scientific knowledge in the cancer field. In the meantime, millions of men must die of cancer unnecessarily.
“Everyone should know that the war on cancer is largely a fraud.” — Dr. Linus Pauling, two time winner of the Nobel Prize
“To the cancer establishment, a cancer patient is a profit center. The actual clinical and scientific evidence does not support the claims of the cancer industry. Conventional cancer treatments are in place as the law of the land because they pay, not heal, the best. Decades of the politics-of-cancer-as-usual have kept you from knowing this, and will continue to do so unless you wake up to their reality.” — John Diamond, M.D.
Lee Cowden, M.D.
“Chemotherapy is an incredibly lucrative business for doctors, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies. The medical establishment wants everyone to follow the same exact protocol. They don’t want to see the chemotherapy industry go under, and that’s the number one obstacle to any progress in oncology.”
— Glen Warner, M.D.
“You wouldn’t believe how many FDA officials, or relatives or acquaintances of FDA officials come to see me as patients in Hanover. You wouldn’t believe this, or directors of the AMA, or ACA, or the presidents of orthodox cancer institutes.”
— Hans Nieper, M.D.,
alternative medicine practitioner
“When Dr. Hamer was arrested in 1997 for having given three people medical advice without a medical license, the police confiscated his patients’ files and had them analyzed. Subsequently, one public prosecutor was forced to admit during the trial that, after five years, 6,000 out of 6,500 patients with mostly ‘terminal cancer’ were still alive. With conventional treatment the figures are generally just the reverse.”
— Dr. Caroline Markolin, Ph.D.
“As a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incomprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear evidence that chemotherapy does much, much more harm than good.”
— Alan Nixon, Ph.D., Past President
of the American Chemical Society
“Two to 4% of cancers respond to chemotherapy.”
— Ralph Moss, Ph.D.
“The FDA protects the big drug companies, and is subsequently rewarded, and using the government’s police powers, they attack those who threaten the big drug companies. The thing that bugs me is that the people think the FDA is protecting them. It isn’t. What the FDA is doing, and what the public thinks it is doing are as different as night and day.”
— Dr. Herbert Ley, former
Commissioner of the F.D.A.
“In point of fact, fluoride causes more human cancer deaths, and causes it faster, than any other chemical.”
— Dean Burke, Former Chief Chemist Emeritus,
U.S. National Cancer Institute
“MOST cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy does not eliminate breast, colon or lung cancers. This fact has been documented for over a decade. Yet doctors still use chemotherapy for these tumors. Women with breast cancer are likely to die faster with chemo than without it.”
— Alan Levin, M.D.
When a patient is found to have a tumor, the only thing the doctor discusses with that patient is what he intends to do about the tumor. If a patient with a tumor is receiving radiation or chemotherapy, the only question that is asked is, ‘How is the tumor doing’? No one ever asks how the patient is doing. In my medical training, I remember well seeing patients who were getting radiation and/or chemotherapy. The tumor would get smaller and smaller, but the patient would be getting sicker and sicker. At autopsy we would hear, ‘Isn’t that marvelous! The tumor is gone!’ Yes, it was, but so was the patient. How many millions of times are we going to have to repeat these scenarios before we realize that we are treating the wrong thing?
–Dr. Philip Binzel
After one recent survey, two pathologists reported that after carrying out 400 postmortem examinations, they had found that in MORE than half the patients the wrong diagnosis had been made. This presumably also means that in more than half the patients the wrong treatment had been given. And since so many modern treatments are undeniably powerful, it also presumably means that a large proportion of those patients died because of their treatment. The two pathologists reported that potentially treatable disease was missed in one in seven patients. They found that 65 out of 134 cases of pneumonia had gone unrecognized, while out of 51 patients who had suffered heart attacks, doctors had failed to diagnose the problem in 18 cases.
— Dr. Vernon Coleman
All references found in ‘HIGHLY REPUTABLE HOLISTIC TREATMENT CENTERS‘ section